W.W.W.:
Understanding the entire concept behind our production considering the PowerPoint had illustrated a clear M.I.G.R.A.I.N. analysis of our linked production. This demonstrated our knowledge about our idea as well as understanding our primary viewers. By each slide presenting a sufficient amount of relevant information that was explained, it made our proposal clear of what we intend to do.
Not much information was illustrated on each slide, which primarily key words were mostly stated, which were then elaborated upon. Rather than the audience having to read tons of information of slides, they beneficially listened to our entire idea as we thoroughly explained all the different elements about what we intend to show in our documentary. Using the key words on the presentation as a guide, this assisted us to remember what to talk about when fluently describing our proposed production.
In particular our institution slide could be considered as our best slide in comparison to the rest of the power point. It was carefully explained to the audience in detail and had justified the group’s decision to approach the 'Channel 4' broadcasting institution to sponsor and distribute our '4docs' 4 minute long documentary. Not only the slide show but channel 4 as a institution itself was a sensible idea given that have broadcasted several medium of our kind (documentaries) in the past.
Overall the presentation was well presented bearing in mind not much information was stated on the different slides thus demonstrating our individual speaking skills as well as allowing us to express our overall personal ideas about the production.
E.B.I.:
Several improvements could have been made which includes our slide show to incorporate some sort of issues and debates in relation to our linked production. In particular, a major issue we missed out from our discussion was the model of 'moral panics' in society regarding teenagers. We explained how teenagers’ behavior is deviant but excluded wider context facts such as how their behavior affects society as a result.
Despite our speaking skills explaining our points thoroughly, our presenting skills could be improved seeing as we lacked with giving eye contact with our audience. By not engaging with our audience, they may perhaps felt insulted thus suggesting them to not taking our linked production idea serious. Additionally if we were to include some sort of examples such as pictures and video links it could have assisted our explanations by acting as examples.
Understanding the entire concept behind our production considering the PowerPoint had illustrated a clear M.I.G.R.A.I.N. analysis of our linked production. This demonstrated our knowledge about our idea as well as understanding our primary viewers. By each slide presenting a sufficient amount of relevant information that was explained, it made our proposal clear of what we intend to do.
Not much information was illustrated on each slide, which primarily key words were mostly stated, which were then elaborated upon. Rather than the audience having to read tons of information of slides, they beneficially listened to our entire idea as we thoroughly explained all the different elements about what we intend to show in our documentary. Using the key words on the presentation as a guide, this assisted us to remember what to talk about when fluently describing our proposed production.
In particular our institution slide could be considered as our best slide in comparison to the rest of the power point. It was carefully explained to the audience in detail and had justified the group’s decision to approach the 'Channel 4' broadcasting institution to sponsor and distribute our '4docs' 4 minute long documentary. Not only the slide show but channel 4 as a institution itself was a sensible idea given that have broadcasted several medium of our kind (documentaries) in the past.
Overall the presentation was well presented bearing in mind not much information was stated on the different slides thus demonstrating our individual speaking skills as well as allowing us to express our overall personal ideas about the production.
E.B.I.:
Several improvements could have been made which includes our slide show to incorporate some sort of issues and debates in relation to our linked production. In particular, a major issue we missed out from our discussion was the model of 'moral panics' in society regarding teenagers. We explained how teenagers’ behavior is deviant but excluded wider context facts such as how their behavior affects society as a result.
Despite our speaking skills explaining our points thoroughly, our presenting skills could be improved seeing as we lacked with giving eye contact with our audience. By not engaging with our audience, they may perhaps felt insulted thus suggesting them to not taking our linked production idea serious. Additionally if we were to include some sort of examples such as pictures and video links it could have assisted our explanations by acting as examples.
No comments:
Post a Comment